For more on the flaws in radioactive dating methods, pick up a copy of Thousands Excerpt The most widely used tool to measure the age of the Earth is radioactive decay. Throw Some More Dirt on Radioactive Isotope Dating New data collected by secular researchers has confirmed what creation scientists discovered decades Tags Support Like this artice? Our Ministry relies on the generosity of people like you.
Every small donation helps us develop and publish great articles. The most widely used tool to measure the age of the Earth is radioactive decay. Based on this assumption, scientists use the decay rate of certain substances to date the age of rock formations, fossils, and the Earth itself. However, this assumption has recently come under doubt. Despite this skepticism, there is proof that this is true.
At that same moment, satellites on the other side of the Earth the daylight side detected X rays coming from the sun, which signaled the beginning of a solar flare Ibid. This was not the only evidence for such a change in the radioactive decay rate. As far back as the s, a study of silicon at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York State, and another study of radium at the PTB, a scientific institute in Germany, made similar findings. The journal went on to point out: A change of less than a percent may not sound like a lot.
But if the change is real, rather than an anomaly in the detector, it would challenge the entire concept of half-life and even force physicists to rewrite their nuclear physics textbooks Ibid. Science News went on to report: The samples were kept at constant temperature and humidity, so the changing seasons should have had no effect on the experiment.
The team tried all the fixes it could to get rid of the fluctuations, but, in the end, decided to publish the results Ibid. The results were ignored by the scientific community. Again, the finding made no splash in the scientific community.
Such small fluctuations in the rate of radioactive decay may not seem like much, but, as Science News noted, it is great enough to cause physicists to change their entire way of looking at the concept of half-life and the accuracy with which it measures ancient ages.
Moreover, if solar activity was greater in the past, before humanity began measuring it, then the changes in radioactive decay might actually be greater than those measured by the scientists at Brookhaven, PTB, and Purdue. The Institute for Creation Research published detailed scientific evidence to show that these dating methods have several flaws, and produced evidence to show there was billion-fold accelerated decay in the past, most likely occuring at the time of the Flood.
For more on this important research, visit: